ISSN 2467-6926

A project of

Volume 2, Issue 1, November 2016

Toward developing a humanitarian crowdsourcing model: Enabling medical and disaster response through digital collaboration

  • Received: 01 March 2016 / Accepted: 07 September 2016/ Published online: 07 November 2016
  • https://doi.org/10.18783/cddj.v002.i01.a01

Highlights

  • Digital volunteers were found to be decentralized, diverse, and independent.
  • The four “types of crowdsourced crisis-related information” were: 1) community-based, 2) infrastructure-based, 3) information-based, and 4) future threats. These were shared through five “types of tasks”: 1) text/image data submission; 2) text/image sorting; 3) text/image mapping; 4) object tagging; and 5) donation/ crowdfunding.
  • Digital humanitarian outputs evolved in three phases: 1) first degree material outputs; 2) non-material outputs; and 3) second degree material output.
  • Humanitarian websites presented two crowdsourcing archetypes: 1) crowd creation to crowd solving; and 2) crowd rating to crowd processing.
  • A humanitarian crowdsourcing model is proposed.


Abstract

Lately, the humanitarian community has been utilizing crowdsourcing to facilitate medical and disaster response. Grounded in Geiger et al.’s (2011) Crowdsourcing Information Systems (CIS) and Suroweicki’s (2004) Wisdom of the Crowds (WC), this study contentanalyzed 23 humanitarian crowdsourcing websites to find out how crowdsourcing has enabled medical and disaster response, as evident in global humanitarian movements from 2010 to 2014. Findings revealed that the digital volunteers that generate big data in humanitarian crowdsourcing websites are composed of an independent crowd with diverse opinions and a decentralized demography. The crisis-related inputs they contributed were community-based, infrastructure-based, information-based, and related to future threats. Emerging outputs resulted in three phases: 1) first degree material outputs (e.g., geographic crisis map, and/or text database/resource page); 2) non-material outputs (e.g., planning, strategizing, and operationalization via partner organizations); and 3) second degree material output (e.g., actual medical and disaster response). Results of the analysis suggest that the dynamic process of humanitarian crowdsourcing do not appear to be boxed into the CIS archetypes. Instead, the characteristic of the websites presented a merging of the four archetypes into two: 1) crowd creation and crowd solving; and 2) crowd rating and crowd processing. As an outcome of the study, a humanitarian crowdsourcing model is proposed.


Keywords

crowdsourcing, medical and disaster response, information system, wisdom of the crowds


Corresponding Author

Joyce Anne Quinto
College of Development Communication
University of the Philippines Los Baños
jcquinto@up.edu.ph

Error message here!

Hide Error message here!

Invalid username and/or password.

Forgot your password?

Register a new account

This email is already registered. You can try logging in this account by clicking login above or try a new email if you typed your email by mistake.

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link to create a new password.

Back to log-in

Close